Severe rhabdomyolysis induced by possible drug-drug interaction between Ribociclib and Simvastatin.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-drug interactions with cyclin-dependent kinases inhibitors 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) are known and should be taken into account. CASE REPORT: A 68-year-old woman, on prior Simvastatin therapy, developed severe rhabdomyolysis after three weeks of Ribociclib initiation. She showed general weakness with mobility problems and was admitted to our hospital. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Ribociclib and Simvastatin were discontinued and the patient received intensive intravenous hydration. She finally recovered her mobility after two weeks. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that Simvastatin induced rhabdomyolysis by possible interaction with Ribociclib. Ribociclib is a strong inhibitor of CYP 3A4 and a potential inhibitor of OATP1B1 membrane transporter. Simvastatin plasma concentration may reach toxic levels due to Ribociclib inhibition. To assess the relevance of our hypothesis, we used the Drug Interaction Scale. With a total score of 7, the interaction is considered as "probable." Because of the high risk of severe rhabdomyolysis, the concomitant use of Simvastatin with Ribociclib should be avoided or otherwise careful monitoring of creatine kinase is warranted.

Real-world Evaluation of Oral Vinorelbine in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer: An ESME-MBC Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Vinorelbine is indicated for use in the treatment of MBC as a single agent or in combination but there is little real world data on this molecule and even less on its oral form. We exploited the Unicancer Epidemiology Strategy Medical-Economics (ESME) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) database to investigate current patterns of use of oral vinorelbine (OV), as well as outcomes of patients receiving this drug. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from women and men treated for MBC between 2008 and 2014 at one of 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centres. The efficacy of OV was evaluated in terms of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and treatment duration. The population and patterns of OV usage were also described. RESULTS: A total of 1806 patients (11% of the ESME MBC database) were included in this analysis. OV was prescribed as monotherapy (46%) or in combination (29%), especially with capecitabine. mainly in later treatment lines. Median PFS was 3.3 months: 2.9 months for single agent, 3.6 months for combination therapy. Median OS was 40.9 months. CONCLUSION: Real-world data offer complementary results to the data from traditional clinical trials, but they concern a much larger population. In this ESME MBC cohort, OV was only prescribed to a small subset of MBC patients. OV was mainly given as single agent to patients with heavily pre-treated MBC; less commonly, it was co-administered with capecitabine or anti-HER2, in earlier lines of therapy. PFS was modest but in line with previous reports.

Radiation therapy to the primary tumor for de novo metastatic breast cancer and overall survival in a retrospective multicenter cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of locoregional treatment (LRT) on overall survival (OS) in de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) is still under debate, with very few data available regarding exclusive radiotherapy (ERT) as a therapeutic modality. METHODS: We evaluated the impact of ERT, exclusive surgery, or a combination of surgery plus radiotherapy (bimodality therapy, BMT) on survival outcomes in a national real-life dnMBC cohort. The primary and secondary end points were OS and progression free survival (PFS) according to LRT (ERT, exclusive surgery, BMT) and no LRT. Sensitivity analyses were performed using propensity score matched analyses. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2014, 4507 dnMBC patients were identified. Only patients alive and free from progression under systemic therapy at least 1 year after diagnosis were included (n = 1965). Forty-five percent of patients (891/1965) underwent LRT: 41.1% (n = 366) ERT, 13.7% (n = 122) exclusive surgery, and 45.2% (n = 403) BMT. OS adjusted for major prognostic factors was significantly longer in the ERT and BMT group compared with no-LRT group, but not exclusive surgery (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.49, 0.80], p < 0.001, HR = 0.61, 95%CI [0.47, 0.78], p < 0.001 and HR = 0.87, 95%CI [0.61, 1.26], p = 0.466 respectively). Results were similar after matching on a propensity score. ERT, surgery and BMT were all associated with a significantly better PFS in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: ERT was significantly associated with better OS in dnMBC, in the same magnitude as BMT, compared with no-LRT. However, even with statistical models adjusted for known prognostic factors and propensity score analysis, selection biases cannot be eliminated from observational studies.

Survival Impact of Locoregional Treatment of the Primary Tumor in De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancers in a Large Multicentric Cohort Study: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Improvement in overall survival (OS) by locoregional treatment (LRT) of the primary tumor in de novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of LRT on OS in a large retrospective cohort of de novo MBC patients, with regard to immunohistochemical characteristics and pattern of metastatic dissemination. METHODS: We conducted a multicentric retrospective study of patients diagnosed with de novo MBC selected from the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics MBC database (NCT03275311) between 2008 and 2014. Overall, 4276 women were included in the study. LRT comprised either radiotherapy, surgery, or both. RESULTS: LRT was used in 40% of patients. Compared with no LRT, patients who received LRT were younger (p < 0.0001) and were more likely to have only one metastatic site (p < 0.0001) or bone-only metastases (p < 0.0001). LRT was associated with a significantly better OS based on landmark multivariate analysis at 1-year (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.76, p < 0.001). Similar results were observed in all sensitivity analyses, including propensity score matching. In subgroup analysis, LRT was associated with better OS in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (61.6 vs. 45.9 months, p < 0.001) and HER2-positive tumors (77.2 vs. 52.6 months, p = 0.008), but not in triple-negative tumors (19 vs. 18.6 months, p = 0.54), and was also associated with a reduction in the risk of death in visceral metastatic patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LRT was associated with a significantly better OS in de novo MBC patients, including patients with visceral involvement at diagnosis; however, LRT did not impact OS in triple-negative MBC.

Clinical and genomic analysis of a randomised phase II study evaluating anastrozole and fulvestrant in postmenopausal patients treated for large operable or locally advanced hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant anastrozole and fulvestrant treatment of large operable or locally advanced hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer not eligible for initial breast-conserving surgery, and to identify genomic changes occurring after treatment. METHODS: One hundred and twenty post-menopausal patients were randomised to receive 1 mg anastrozole (61 patients) or 500 mg fulvestrant (59 patients) for 6 months. Genomic DNA copy number profiles were generated for a subgroup of 20 patients before and after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were evaluable for efficacy and 118 for toxicity. The objective response rate determined by clinical palpation was 58.9% (95% CI=45.0-71.9) in the anastrozole arm and 53.8% (95% CI=39.5-67.8) in the fulvestrant arm. The breast-conserving surgery rate was 58.9% (95% CI=45.0-71.9) in the anastrozole arm and 50.0% (95% CI=35.8-64.2) in the fulvestrant arm. Pathological responses >50% occurred in 24 patients (42.9%) in the anastrozole arm and 13 (25.0%) in the fulvestrant arm. The Ki-67 score fell after treatment but there was no significant difference between the reduction in the two arms (anastrozole 16.7% (95% CI=13.3-21.0) before, 3.2% (95% CI=1.9-5.5) after, n=43; fulvestrant 17.1% (95%CI=13.1-22.5) before, 3.2% (95% CI=1.8-5.7) after, n=38) or between the reduction in Ki-67 in clinical responders and non-responders. Genomic analysis appeared to show a reduction of clonal diversity following treatment with selection of some clones with simpler copy number profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Both anastrozole and fulvestrant were effective and well-tolerated, enabling breast-conserving surgery in over 50% of patients. Clonal changes consistent with clonal selection by the treatment were seen in a subgroup of patients.

Treatment patterns, clinical outcomes and health care costs associated with HER2-positive breast cancer with central nervous system metastases: a French multicentre observational study.

BACKGROUND: The population of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) who develop central nervous system (CNS) metastases is growing. Treatment strategies in this population are highly diverse. The objective of the study was to assess health care costs for the management of HER2 positive BC with CNS metastases. METHODS: This multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted on HER2-positive BC patients diagnosed with CNS metastases between 2006 and 2008. Data were extracted from patient medical records to estimate health care resource use. A partitioned estimator was used to adjust censoring costs by use of the Kaplan-Meier survival estimate. RESULTS: 218 patients were included and costs were estimated for 200 patients. The median time to detection of CNS metastases was 37.6 months. The first metastatic event involved the CNS in 39 patients, and this was the unique first metastatic site in 31 of these patients. Two years following diagnosis of CNS metastases, 70.3% of patients had died. The mean per capita cost of HER2-positive BC with CNS metastases in the first year following diagnosis was €35,735 [95% CI: 31,716-39,898]. The proportion of costs attributed to expensive drugs and those arising from hospitalisation were in the same range. CONCLUSION: A range of individualised disease management strategies are used in HER2-positive BC patients with CNS metastases and the treatments used in the first months following diagnosis are expensive. The understanding of cost drivers may help optimise healthcare expenditure and inform the development of appropriate prevention policies.

[Breast cancer diagnosis among women aged 75 and over: study on information delivered by organized breast cancer screening agencies to women reaching the limit age]. / Diagnostic du cancer du sein après 74 ans: information donnée par les structures de gestion du dépistage organisé à la sortie de la tranche d'âge concernée.

Breast cancer among older women is a major and increasing public health issue. No clear recommendation has been established in France after 74 years, the age limit for state-organised screening program. A survey was performed among all regional agencies in charge of the breast screening to analyse which information is delivered to women reaching the age of 75 years. A postal survey sent to 91 French organised cancer screening agencies. Among the 89 agencies that answered, only 22 deliver a systematic written information. Twelve suggest that mammographic screening should be continued, and five mention clinical examination. Twenty agencies dispatch the screening to general practitioners or gynaecologists. Two information letters insist on the ongoing risk of breast cancer. Most of the written information is given with the last mammography report. No impact study has ever been performed. In our study, only 25% of the screening agencies give systematic information to women. The modalities and the substance of this information are heterogeneous. A better information seems to be a key-point for earlier clinical breast cancer diagnosis among older women, for whom there is little direct evidence of the benefit of systematic mammographic screening.

First-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer in patients ≥75 years: a retrospective single-centre analysis.

Data on chemotherapy for elderly patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) are limited. We performed a 7-year retrospective analysis of MBC patients at our institution receiving first-line chemotherapy aged ≥75 years. Of 117 patients, 103 received monotherapy (67 capecitabine, 29 vinorelbine, 5 docetaxel, 2 liposomal doxorubicin) and 14 received polychemotherapy (12 anthracycline-based, 2 vinorelbine-gemcitabine). Chemotherapy demonstrated acceptable tolerability. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from initiation of chemotherapy were 6.2 months and 13.8 months, respectively. At 2 years, 25% of patients were alive; however, 25% died within 3 months of beginning chemotherapy. Independent prognostic factors for longer PFS were good performance status, absence of visceral disease and capecitabine treatment. Good performance status and lack of visceral disease were also significant for OS. These results suggest that palliative chemotherapy should not be systematically excluded in this setting, but should be carefully discussed as it appears to be feasible with apparent benefit in selected patients.

First-line capecitabine monotherapy for slowly progressing metastatic breast cancer: do we need aggressive treatment?

BACKGROUND: Primary treatment goals in less aggressive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are prolonged survival, good quality of life and control of the disease and its symptoms. High activity, oral administration and no alopecia make capecitabine monotherapy attractive in slowly evolving disease. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 226 patients who had received single-agent capecitabine as 1st-line chemotherapy at our institution. RESULTS: The median interval between breast cancer diagnosis and MBC was 52 months (range 0-479); 76% had received endocrine therapy for MBC, 58% had visceral involvement and 30% had 3 or more metastatic sites. The median starting dose was 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily. Disease was improved in 56% of the patients (median duration: 13.2 months) and stabilised in 20%. Median time to treatment failure was 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.1-10.5); median overall survival from initiating capecitabine was 23.6 months (95% CI: 19.7-27.4). Prior adjuvant chemotherapy, endocrine therapy for MBC, visceral disease, hormone receptor status and initial capecitabine dose did not influence time to treatment failure. Among 161 patients <75 years, 90% received further chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, 1st-line capecitabine should be considered in slowly progressing disease, offering an active, well-tolerated oral treatment with minimal toxicity and no alopecia. More toxic treatments may be reserved for more aggressive disease.